Process

Scholars consider how to address digital consumer fraud.

Scholar argues that mechanisms for quicker approval of strong asylum claims would alleviate pressure on the U.S. asylum system.

Scholars argue that federal drug agency actions should take precedence over conflicting state regulations.

A Penn Program on Regulation panel brings together leaders from independent agencies to discuss the implications of presidential actions taken to remove them.

Scholar argues that restrictions on sports-betting advertising can align with commercial free speech protections.

Experts discuss how policymakers can rebuild unemployment benefits for a changing economy.

Scholar discusses the limits of AI as a tool for prediction and planning.

The FCC’s authority to regulate needs to reflect the modern realities of broadcasting.

The Court should not overturn a settled doctrine that ensures the fair use of airwaves.

Scholars and practitioners debate the continued need for the FCC’s fairness doctrine for broadcast news.

Abolishing needed protections through the Congressional Review Act is not effective oversight.

Scholar suggests that recent shifts in administrative law will matter less than critics fear and supporters hope.