Process

The Supreme Court limits judicial remedies and increases deference to executive power in immigration enforcement.

Adopting a chainsaw-based approach to reform undermines the goal of creating a more efficient government.

Scholars and practitioners examine the Court’s most important regulatory decisions of this past term.

Scholars explore the differences among states’ implementation of freedom of information laws.

A recent court decision may help protect civil servants unlawfully removed by the Trump Administration.

Judicial review does not easily address problematic exercises of presidential influence in agency rulemaking.

The unique history of tax regulation presents several possibilities for courts.

The Trump Administration will struggle to convince courts to uphold the repeal of many agency rules.

The likely end of the FCC’s independence should spur Congress to overhaul the agency.

ACUS recommends inviting public participation in rulemaking even when agencies forgo notice and comment.

ACUS recommends best practices for AI and algorithmic tools to detect and prosecute regulatory violations.

ACUS recommends allowing nonlawyers to represent parties in agency adjudications.