Process

The Trump Administration is underweighting the value of human health in benefit-cost analysis.

EPA’s new rule fails to reform the agency’s methods for calculating benefits when regulating particulate matter.

The Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to decline to monetize effects from air pollution prompts reactions by regulatory experts.

Congress’s expanded use of its oversight mechanism threatens the stability of agency action.

A recent case concerning the National Guard may signal growing Supreme Court skepticism of President Trump’s appeals.

The Roberts Court should follow its own reasoned decision-making requirements to constrain regulatory demolition.

The Supreme Court should reconsider the doctrine requiring courts to take a hard look at agency policy changes.

Courts must distinguish substantive from procedural duties in agency review to preserve reasoned decision-making.

The Supreme Court should continue to apply a strong version of the duty to engage in reasoned decision-making

Scholars debate whether the duty to engage in reasoned decision-making should be reconsidered.

Gillian E. Metzger discusses how the U.S. Supreme Court has reshaped administrative law.

Scholars argue that the U.S. government should adapt to address rampant loss of regulatory body quorums.