The normative foundations of the value of statistical life render it an insufficient tool to analyze pandemic-related policies.
Requiring government institutions to engage in reasoned decision-making mitigates actions made in bad faith.
Scholar argues for regulatory reforms grounded in an intense focus on net benefits.
Policy-free textual analysis wins when interpreting causation standards in statutory text for employment actions.
The hyper-deference courts provide to agencies has failed to protect workers from OSHA inaction amid COVID-19.
The Supreme Court has destabilized principles on federal agencies’ structures and for-cause removal.
Scholars and practitioners highlight the Court’s most significant regulatory and administrative law decisions.
A recent Supreme Court case suggests Congress needs new processes to legislate effectively and overcome partisanship.
Scholars argue that the Trans-Pacific Partnership represents a new form of international ordering and regulatory governance.
ACUS issues new recommendation to help agency adjudicators conduct online independent research.
ACUS recommendations seek to improve the processes for hiring government lawyers.
An ACUS recommendation could help agencies better organize their economics staffs.