Synopsis

Qualified Immunity as Gun Control

Qualified Immunity as Gun Control

Scholars argue that qualified immunity could shield officers who confiscate guns from dangerous individuals from liability.

A Green Wash-Out

A Green Wash-Out

A scholar analyzes the differences between the American and EU approaches to regulating greenwashing.

Reconsidering Online Platforms’ Liability

Reconsidering Online Platforms’ Liability

To protect users’ free speech and privacy rights, scholar calls for limiting online platforms’ legal shield.

Breaking the Climate Disaster Cycle

Breaking the Climate Disaster Cycle

Scholar proposes new strategies for disaster law that focus on proactivity.

When Can a Business Refuse to Sell?

When Can a Business Refuse to Sell?

Scholar argues that 303 Creative only grants businesses a limited First Amendment right not to provide service.

The Underregulation of Carcinogen Exposure

The Underregulation of Carcinogen Exposure

Scholar calls for Congress to empower regulators to limit exposure to cancer-causing chemicals.

The Right to Self-Shelter

The Right to Self-Shelter

Scholar argues that unhoused individuals should have the right to decide whether to use government shelter.

Freeing Students From Online Surveillance

Freeing Students From Online Surveillance

Scholar calls for reform of schools’ surveillance systems to protect students’ rights to free speech and privacy.

Increasing Protections for Farm Animals

Increasing Protections for Farm Animals

Scholar recommends that federal legislators impose humane housing requirements for all farm animals.

Mandating Contract Comprehensibility

Mandating Contract Comprehensibility

Scholar argues that standardized contracts need to be understandable to be enforceable.

Tackling Illegal and Unregulated Fishing

Tackling Illegal and Unregulated Fishing

Scholar recommends that legislators tighten restrictions on unlawful fishing.

Valuing Animal Life in Regulatory Impact Analyses

Valuing Animal Life in Regulatory Impact Analyses

Scholar argues that regulators should value the lives of animals in their benefit-cost analyses.