Scholar argues that inconsistent animal welfare labeling practices harm consumers.
Scholars argue that courts could interpret the Clayton Act to prevent mergers that result in lowering wages.
Scholar advocates expanding federal legal protections against genetic discrimination.
Scholar argues that social media companies should be more democratic in restricting political advertisements.
Scholars assert that the accord has achieved more than would be expected of a non-binding agreement.
Policy experts argue that the U.S. Department of Transportation’s regulatory role should be reduced.
Scholars consider methods to regulate the practice of setting individualized prices based on personal data.
Scholar recommends consumer protection laws to combat misuse of data in the sharing economy.
Scholar argues for regulatory reforms grounded in an intense focus on net benefits.
Scholars call for greater transparency in how FDA uses subjective evidence in treatments for brain injuries.
Scholars argue that the Trans-Pacific Partnership represents a new form of international ordering and regulatory governance.
Scholar examines the institutional review board process for resolving disputes in human subjects research.