Judicial Review in American and European Competition Law
Despite differences, antitrust enforcement models in the U.S. and Europe have some features in common.
Regulatory Opinion: Year in Review
RegBlog celebrates 2013 by featuring our top opinion posts from the past year.
Cost and Benefit Changes During Federal Rulemakings
Data from recent rulemakings do not show that OIRA review systematically lowers estimated benefits and increases estimated costs.
My Pathway
Robert A. Kagan provides his own perspective on major influences and broad themes underpinning his research.
Robert A. Kagan: Scholar of Professional Expertise
Kagan’s agenda favors professionalism as the key alternative to hyper-adversarial contestation.
Kagan the Comparativist
Robert A. Kagan’s comparative perspective on American law and politics has set the stage for a productive debate over regulation.
Robert A. Kagan: Man of Style
Kagan’s insight on legal “styles” paves the way for future regulatory studies and policymaking efforts.
Kagan the Explorer
Robert A. Kagan’s research is a quest to understand legal authority and how it works in the world.
Learning from the FDA’s Plan B Fiasco
Plan B episode calls for reconsidering the scope of judicial review and the role of politics in rulemaking.
Moving Toward the Evaluation State
By taking three feasible steps, the administration could help build a regulatory culture more supportive of ex post evaluation.
The Anti-Capture Justification for Regulatory Review
Better understanding of OIRA’s role – and its rationale – provides a new agenda for reform.
Dangerous Dust and Deadly Delay: OSHA’s Proposed Silica Rule
Cost-effective workplace safety rule would save 700 lives a year.