Two essays by student winners of a Penn Law essay competition describe important regulatory developments.
Scholars argue that federal agencies should not use guidance documents to regulate controversial issues.
Scholars consider methods for regulating individualized prices based on personal data.
An arts-based framework could re-democratize the rulemaking process.
Better oversight is needed of the “biohacking” that individuals perform on themselves.
Opinion letter finds a gig economy company’s workers are independent contractors.
American doctrines of judicial review may provide useful models for Brazilian courts.
Scholar argues that the Trump Administration has discredited cost-benefit analysis.
The late justice’s opinion in Chevron v. NRDC has greatly shaped judicial reasoning about administrative law.
Risk-based regulation requires regulators to choose which decision-making principles to apply.
Canada’s experience with treating health care as a right provides lessons for universal health care in America.
Expert calls for an overhaul of the existing evidentiary framework for Social Security disability cases.