The Regulatory Review highlights the top essays written by our contributors in 2022.
A terrible trio of Supreme Court cases from last term illustrates the need for judicial reform, which can occur through several options.
Rejecting EPA’s ability to reshape the coal industry, the Court forecasts invalidating future agency actions.
In West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court cements the major questions doctrine and strengthens the separation of powers.
Three takeaways follow from the Supreme Court’s recent opinions ignoring Chevron v. NRDC.
Scholars and practitioners discuss the Court’s most significant regulatory decisions of the last term.
One of the Supreme Court’s most significant administrative law precedents may soon be overturned.
The Supreme Court is forcing a deregulatory agenda under the guise of restoring democracy.
Supreme Court changes in administrative law create uncertainty for new antitrust guidance from federal regulators.
A recent U.S. Supreme Court case highlights death row inmates’ contested religious rights at executions.
Originalist arguments for rewriting administrative law are weaker than they seem.
In rejecting agency action on the basis of the “major questions doctrine,” judges undermine congressional policies.