The Supreme Court is forcing a deregulatory agenda under the guise of restoring democracy.
Supreme Court changes in administrative law create uncertainty for new antitrust guidance from federal regulators.
A recent U.S. Supreme Court case highlights death row inmates’ contested religious rights at executions.
Originalist arguments for rewriting administrative law are weaker than they seem.
In rejecting agency action on the basis of the “major questions doctrine,” judges undermine congressional policies.
Scholar argues that recent Supreme Court decisions create a new vision of agency accountability to the public.
In a recent case, the Supreme Court failed to address the purpose of exemptions from EPA’s renewable fuel standard.
The Court’s unprecedented decision applying the Takings Clause to regulatory access will have limited impact.
Collins v. Yellen further clarifies the scope of “for cause” removal of agency heads.
The repercussions of a recent Supreme Court decision could affect future trade regulations.
CIC Services avoided anti-administrative rhetoric while securing the check of judicial review on the IRS.
With its Prometheus decision, the U.S. Supreme Court centered agency deference in reasonableness.