Trump Administration

DOGE’s approach to deregulation demonstrates the need for economists and lawyers to learn from each other.

The deregulatory goals of the 1-in-10-out directive may be stymied by agency gaming and legal challenges.

The Trump Administration’s new 1-in-10-out executive order is more flawed than its predecessor.

Scholars discuss the history of birthright citizenship and its modern importance.

Trump’s 1-in-10-out executive order threatens necessary regulations and existing constitutional norms.

A Supreme Court that embraces a powerful executive could aid President Trump’s efforts to eliminate agency independence.

A recent Trump executive order unlawfully undermines the authority of independent agencies.

Legal debate ensues over the Office of Personnel Management’s deferred resignation program.

Scholars unveil new research on the challenges undocumented students face in the wake of DACA’s retrenchment.

Legal questions raised in the first weeks of the Trump Administration may require the Supreme Court to make difficult decisions quickly.

The incoming Trump Administration again promises massive deregulation, but it remains to be seen how much can realistically be rolled back.

Scholar argues that President Trump’s deregulatory agenda was not successful in the long term.