Scholar argues that social media companies should be more democratic in restricting political advertisements.
International response to Christchurch attack shows the complexity of restricting online extremist content.
Technology giants face growing scrutiny from Congress and regulators over their dominance.
Scholar argues that the government should regulate app developers to prevent technology addiction.
Naming and shaming can serve as a legitimate, efficient, and democratic regulatory approach.
Scholar argues that shaming is an effective tool against violators of regulations.
Scholar argues that section 230 of the Communications Decency Act applies to internet platforms regardless of their “neutrality.”
Facebook does not have a viable system to predict suicide in users.
Scholars argue that video and audio fabrications could threaten modern government but lack satisfactory regulatory solutions.
Scholars argue for strengthening regulations of online political advertising.
Law student argues that recent European Union privacy regulation does not fully protect children.
Author argues that FTC disclosure rules may infringe upon endorsers’ right to free speech.