Naming and shaming can serve as a legitimate, efficient, and democratic regulatory approach.
Scholar argues that shaming is an effective tool against violators of regulations.
Scholar argues that section 230 of the Communications Decency Act applies to internet platforms regardless of their “neutrality.”
Facebook does not have a viable system to predict suicide in users.
Scholars argue that video and audio fabrications could threaten modern government but lack satisfactory regulatory solutions.
Scholars argue for strengthening regulations of online political advertising.
Law student argues that recent European Union privacy regulation does not fully protect children.
Author argues that FTC disclosure rules may infringe upon endorsers’ right to free speech.
Scholar analyzes how traditional police regulation must change in the face of cybercrime.
EPA provides advice instead of regulation in the new nanny state.
Provisions of the Senate’s Regulatory Accountability Act would do more harm than good.
The last five years saw a fundamental shift in how the government interacts with the public.