Ninth Circuit orders EPA to propose a new standard for lead dust and an updated definition for lead paint.
Recent revisions to China’s administrative regulations will not guarantee effective public participation.
Despite attacks from conservatives, guidance documents help agencies and regulated firms comply with the law.
New requirements such as notice-and-comment periods and public hearings should improve transparency.
Claims that the Trump Administration has radically reduced regulation are simply not true.
The United States needs a bipartisan push to bring transparency and accountability back into the rulemaking process.
Countries like Australia and Canada offer models for reining in delegation of lawmaking authority to agencies.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. EPA illustrates that the public has a serious role to play in the rulemaking process.
Scalia recounts his role in challenging a SEC rule on behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Appearing before agencies affords the public an important opportunity to have a genuine impact on the law.
Public participation in the rulemaking process serves a vital role in improving the law.
Administrative agencies should not be required to use a process that has been obsolete for decades.