Marchand’s argument questions key regulatory processes and ignores the net benefits of regulation.
EPA exemplifies how agency rulemaking pushes the boundaries of lawful policymaking.
EPA’s advance notice raises fundamental questions about how the agency should weigh costs and benefits.
OIRA review of significant tax rules raises new questions about the shape of centralized administrative oversight.
Former EPA Administrator’s last action may foreshadow the agency’s future plans for regulating pollution.
The deregulatory agenda should be replaced with a regulatory improvement agenda.
Independent agencies should mirror executive branch practices to overcome judicial scrutiny.
Expanding a White House office could help shrink the whole federal government.
The Trump Administration’s new social cost of carbon policy muddies the waters.
OMB proposal to revise its racial and ethnic categories may better reflect America’s changing demographics.
Public Citizen and the Coalition for Sensible Safeguards convened panels of regulatory experts.
When a regulation’s benefits exceed its costs, simplicity and interdisciplinary processes are essential to reducing capture.