Loper Bright

The Roberts Court should follow its own reasoned decision-making requirements to constrain regulatory demolition.

The Supreme Court should reconsider the doctrine requiring courts to take a hard look at agency policy changes.

Aaron Nielson discusses the forces driving changes in the administrative state.

Scholars analyze how the use of machine learning could reshape EPA drinking water standards.

Scholar suggests that recent shifts in administrative law will matter less than critics fear and supporters hope.

EPA’s attempts to reinterpret the Clean Air Act are detrimental to fighting climate change.

The unique history of tax regulation presents several possibilities for courts.

A federal consumer protection agency’s withdrawal of numerous guidance documents will have little legal effect.

Executive orders to repeal rules and redefine “showerhead” contain a jarring assertion of presidential authority.

Repeal of EPA’s endangerment finding on greenhouse gases faces hurdles and would threaten regulatory instability.

The Trump Administration has invoked recent Supreme Court decisions to justify unraveling normal rulemaking procedures.

The end of deference to agency statutory interpretations will result in regulatory inconsistency.