Judicial Review

Recent Supreme Court rulings create the need to insulate administrative decisions from judicial review.

ACUS’s recommendation on judicial review of federal regulations provides much-needed clarity.

ACUS identifies best practices for agency guidance, adjudications, and responses to constituent service requests.

With several key decisions this term, the Supreme Court has shaken up prevailing governing doctrines and produced substantial legal uncertainty.

Loper Bright significantly expands the power of the Supreme Court at the expense of democratic institutions of government.

The Administrative Procedure Act empowers courts—not agencies—to decide a statute’s single best meaning.

Scholars and practitioners assess the Court’s most significant regulatory decisions of its recently concluded term.

Scholar suggests that increasing the number of support staff would improve the accuracy of administrative adjudication.

Scholar argues that recent Supreme Court decisions create a new vision of agency accountability to the public.

Scholars explain how courts have interpreted the Administrative Procedure Act to overlook racial discrimination.

Scholar brings the focus of administrative law to the level of municipal government.

The filibuster has caused Congress to give up its constitutional power to oversee the administrative state.