Scholar shows that regulatory bodies use arrests as informational proxies—but that this use has its costs.
Scholars analyze linguistic and cultural barriers asylum-seekers face in the credible fear interview process.
Two scholars argue that immigration adjudication should no longer be afforded Chevron deference.
Muslims and activists call on President Biden to protect Muslims against discriminatory federal practices.
The Supreme Court will decide whether federal courts are required to presume the credibility of noncitizens.
DHS must exercise greater transparency about the use, testing, and disposal of biometric information collected in the immigration context.
Timely and extensive interventions have facilitated Portugal’s success in addressing COVID-19.
DHS proposes implementing asylum application fees and extending applicants’ pre-employment waiting period.
Recent Trump Administration immigration policy survives round one in the courts.
In less than two years, the former Attorney General spearheaded significant changes to the U.S. immigration system.
Scholar examines the former Attorney General’s increased political oversight of immigration courts.
The Trump Administration violated administrative procedure to overhaul asylum policy.