Federal and state environmental regulations ignore and exclude Native perspectives.
The Supreme Court rules that the Forest Service can approve natural gas pipelines crossing the Appalachian Trail.
Despite guidance from the Supreme Court, the future of water regulation remains uncertain.
Congressional intent and clear statutory text promote common-sense enforcement of federal water regulations.
A proposed rule aims to facilitate economic growth at the expense of federal environmental reviews.
EPA’s proposed relaxation of a rule restricting water pollution from coal plants generates controversy.
Certain communities may face disproportionate harms in the wake of natural disasters.
Government leaders must take swift action to mitigate the risks of wildfire disasters.
The judicial system may need to adapt to allow climate change cases to be heard in court.
Democratic primary candidates are competing to define the scale and scope of climate action.
Scholars offer suggestions for how regulation can reduce disparities in exposure to environmental problems.
The lack of regulation on animals’ greenhouse gas emissions opens the door for climate change litigation.