To avoid potential legal challenges, agencies should take even more care in their regulatory planning, review, and communication.
An upcoming SCOTUS case provides an opening for greater dispute over the power of regulatory agencies.
Three takeaways follow from the Supreme Court’s recent opinions ignoring Chevron v. NRDC.
Scholars and practitioners discuss the Court’s most significant regulatory decisions of the last term.
One of the Supreme Court’s most significant administrative law precedents may soon be overturned.
Scholar argues that overruling deference to agencies will constrain U.S. government action.
With two Medicare cases, the U.S. Supreme Court may change an important rule on deference to agency decisions.
A controversial approval of an Alzheimer’s treatment reveals a core weakness in oversight of agency discretion.
Two scholars argue that immigration adjudication should no longer be afforded Chevron deference.
Deregulatory attacks have twisted a legal concept meant only to restrain extraordinary actions.
The U.S. Supreme Court could take a cue from Michigan and other states on reviving the nondelegation doctrine.
A recent case protecting LGBTQ rights may help the Supreme Court circumscribe the administrative state.