Opinion

Legal scholar argues that the oft-criticized formal rulemaking process has virtues in proper settings.

Provisions of the Senate’s Regulatory Accountability Act would do more harm than good.

Regulatory reform bill’s requirement of oral evidentiary hearings for rulemakings may prove to be ineffective.

Oral argument transcripts may reveal Supreme Court Justices’ motivations for speaking.

The Trump Administration’s new social cost of carbon policy muddies the waters.

Both President Trump and environmental advocates overstate the effects of repealing the Clean Power Plan.

The Regulatory Review’s editor-in-chief reflects on the publication’s past year of coverage, against the backdrop of a fast-changing regulatory world.

This publication’s new name and newly designed website constitute a significant step forward, in furtherance of its mission of public service.

The Trump Administration’s embrace of a seldom-used law may undermine future regulatory efforts.

Bill aimed at regulatory reform would reintroduce burdensome administrative requirements.

Judge Gorsuch’s confirmation hearings offer a key opportunity to examine a judge’s philosophy on the judiciary’s proper role under the Constitution.

Balancing the discretion afforded to multinational and domestic authorities presents special challenges to judges in ensuring effective application of European Union environmental law.