Opinion

HHS’s new artificial intelligence strategy tests management-based regulation.

Despite the retraction of a recent study, economists still agree that climate change is expensive and dangerous.

Society’s various concerns about AI must suitably be placed into a national legal strategy.

EPA’s decision to retreat from regulating greenhouse gas emissions runs contrary to law.

AI regulations should be guided by humility and continuous learning.

Regulations are the product of negotiations and agreements.

The federal government is moving backwards in its regulatory analysis and decision-making.

The Trump Administration is underweighting the value of human health in benefit-cost analysis.

EPA’s new rule fails to reform the agency’s methods for calculating benefits when regulating particulate matter.

Congress’s expanded use of its oversight mechanism threatens the stability of agency action.

Effective antitrust enforcement in the electricity sector can promote competition and protect consumers’ interests.

A recent case concerning the National Guard may signal growing Supreme Court skepticism of President Trump’s appeals.