Supreme Court

The Supreme Court’s administrative law decisions allow racial animus to motivate policy choices.

The U.S. Supreme Court could take a cue from Michigan and other states on reviving the nondelegation doctrine.

Justice Ginsburg paved the way toward gender equality, inspiring generations to advocate justice under the law.

Through her opinions, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg sought to instill equality and justice in the law.

President Trump’s reactions to Supreme Court decisions threaten the legitimacy of the nation’s judicial system.

The Supreme Court relied on misleading arguments and revisionist history to strike down the CFPB’s structure.

Empirical study of the ACA’s implementation provides insight into the delegation of policymaking authority.

A concurring opinion leaves the standard for determining the constitutionality of abortion restrictions in doubt.

The Supreme Court rules that the Forest Service can approve natural gas pipelines crossing the Appalachian Trail.

The Supreme Court reaffirms lower courts’ ability to claw-back profits from violators of securities laws.

Requiring government institutions to engage in reasoned decision-making mitigates actions made in bad faith.

Administrative law principles led the Supreme Court to deliver a victorious but unsatisfying and uncertain conclusion for migrants.