The Supreme Court is Answering Easy Questions
The Supreme Court’s case selection reveals a hesitancy to tackle major securities law issues.
Doctrinal Divergence at the Supreme Court
Scholar assesses the Supreme Court’s differential treatment of administrative law and securities law.
Shedding Light on Shadow Banking
Scholars argue that securities law can mitigate the risks posed by bank-like financial institutions.
Bank Regulation and Risks to Financial Stability
Scholars examine bank and cryptocurrency regulation and assess potential risks to financial stability and resilience.
Sharing the Private Market Pie
Scholar warns that opening private markets to ordinary individuals could leave these less sophisticated investors with all the risk and less reward.
A Green Wash-Out
A scholar analyzes the differences between the American and EU approaches to regulating greenwashing.
AI Providers Should Not Be Liable for Users’ Securities Violations
Policymakers are considering a liability regime that is bad economics and bad law.
Decoding Cryptocurrency Regulation
Scholars present a framework for digital asset regulation to prevent fraudulent and deceptive practices.
The Promise and Perils of Regulating ESG
Troy A. Paredes, former SEC Commissioner, shares his thoughts on the ESG movement.
Leaving Broker Inducements Behind
Scholar presents defenses that the SEC may use to legitimize restrictions on broker inducements.
Back to the Future of U.S. Securities Regulation
Scholars analyze the history of Supreme Court securities law jurisprudence to predict what lies ahead.
Why the SEC is Wrong About Implied Preclusion
Federal securities regulators should not use implied preclusion to shield themselves from constitutional challenge.











