What would Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation mean for the U.S. Supreme Court’s administrative law decisions?
Improving regulatory performance is vital for making Americans better off.
Policy oscillation creates serious problems that may require government scrutiny.
Scholars and industry representatives highlight takeaways from conference on new regulatory developments.
Citizens are more likely to comply with regulations that they perceive as enacted through a fair process.
Rankings for company’s new headquarters offer cautionary lessons about using rankings as regulatory tools.
The Trump Administration’s purported economic justification weakens the credibility of cost-benefit analysis.
Executive Order 13,771 could lead to incidents like the Grenfell Tower fire in the United States.
This publication’s new name and newly designed website constitute a significant step forward, in furtherance of its mission of public service.
A regulation that provides a benefit in excess of a cost while helping the disadvantaged subsets of society should be seen as doubly wise.
Prevention of such catastrophe requires adept networking of regulatory scholarship, like that demonstrated in an important new book.
Under President Trump’s executive order, the benefits of new regulations will play no role in regulatory decision-making.