Homepage Feature

Calls for more deference to agency expertise derive from an unrealistic view of executive policymaking.

Several U.S. Supreme Court cases from this past term have significant implications for the provision of medical care.

In West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court cements the major questions doctrine and strengthens the separation of powers.

Three takeaways follow from the Supreme Court’s recent opinions ignoring Chevron v. NRDC.

DHS has discretion to end its policy requiring noncitizens to wait in Mexico pending their immigration proceedings.

The Supreme Court casts a shadow across the regulatory state in opinion limiting EPA’s ability to fight climate change.

The Supreme Court applies a contested history of firearms regulation to evaluate the constitutionality of firearms restrictions.

Organizations should tailor contract requirements for procured AI systems based on levels of risk.

The majority’s reasoning in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health entrenches the historical failures of the United States.

Scholars and practitioners discuss the Court’s most significant regulatory decisions of the last term.

Measurement modeling could further the government’s understanding of AI policymaking tools.

Soft law standards can promote responsible procurement of artificial intelligence systems.