Environment

Experts argue that the United States can do more to reduce the risk of climate change on financial markets.

As millions of acres burn along the West Coast, the United States must improve the way it manages forest fires.

Corporate counsel should heed regulators’ warnings that climate change is a risk to the financial industry.

Scholar argues that energy regulations that once protected consumers now block renewable energy companies.

The world needs a new strategy to fight climate change aggressively and effectively.

Scholar asserts that federal law and incentive structures should facilitate renewable energy development on tribal lands.

Critics argue that a federal regulator’s failure to address climate change clashes with the goal of efficient markets.

A revised CEQ rule seeks to limit judicial review of agency action, threatening the separation of powers.

Scholars assert that the accord has achieved more than would be expected of a non-binding agreement.

The Supreme Court rules that the Forest Service can approve natural gas pipelines crossing the Appalachian Trail.

Despite guidance from the Supreme Court, the future of water regulation remains uncertain.

The Supreme Court appears inconsistently enthusiastic about federal regulation and state-centric environmentalism.