The history of regulatory policy in the United States is rich, but its future remains unclear.
Leading scholars compare deregulation under the Reagan and Trump Administrations.
The Regulatory Review presents its leading essays from the past year.
Retrospective regulatory review should concentrate not only on reducing costs but also on creating benefits, like improving societal well-being.
Some states are using regulatory approaches to ensure the accountability of law enforcement officials.
The Trump Administration’s ill-advised “law and order” approach to policing should be eschewed in favor of procedural justice.
Existing rules can help ensure police use best practices for interacting with those who have special needs.
Technology can help address the dearth of data surrounding police use of force.
A number of Supreme Court doctrines make it difficult for citizens to sue police officers and their government employers.
An agency modeled after the federal transportation safety board could promote safety for the public and police.
More agencies are embracing a new kind of review focused on preventing future errors, rather than placing blame.
The legal standard governing police force provides inadequate guidance to police officers and the courts.