Regulating AI Companions
Scholars examine how regulators should respond to risks posed by AI companions.
The Promise and Limits of the TAKE IT DOWN Act
Recent legislation aims to limit the spread of non-consensual intimate images, but its reach has limits.
The Hidden Debate Behind a €120 Million Fine
Whether and how technological changes reshape free speech rights remain contested questions across the Atlantic.
Section 230 and AI-Driven Platforms
Scholars examine how a dated law shapes liability for artificial intelligence used by social media platforms.
Stewardship or Censorship at the FCC
Experts debate whether the FCC is necessary to the information marketplace or a dangerous anachronism.
Reconsidering Online Platforms’ Liability
To protect users’ free speech and privacy rights, scholar calls for limiting online platforms’ legal shield.
The Good-Faith Assumption Online
Scholar argues that online platforms should foster positive user experiences through self-regulation.
The Boundaries of Internet Speech
Scholars debate current challenges in regulating offensive and harmful speech on the internet.
Modern Romance Hinges on Dating App Self-Regulation
Scholar proposes that the dating app industry adopt a self-regulatory model to promote user safety.
Is the Fair Housing Act Stifled by Section 230?
Scholar argues that a platform liability shield limits protection from housing discrimination.
Punting Social Media Company Liability to Congress
The Supreme Court affirms social media companies’ business models, dodging for now the issue of liability for harmful speech.
The Supreme Court and the Future of the Internet
Upcoming Supreme Court decisions may reshape the legal risks facing tech companies.











