Experts argue that the United States can do more to reduce the risk of climate change on financial markets.
Critics argue that a federal regulator’s failure to address climate change clashes with the goal of efficient markets.
Scholars assert that the accord has achieved more than would be expected of a non-binding agreement.
Scholar argues that society is best off when regulators punish violations after the fact.
Scholars argue that the EPA take a new approach to reducing CO2 emissions.