The formal and structural exclusion of transgender youth is morally wrong and unlawful.
Title IX has evolved from prohibiting sex discrimination in sports to perpetuating it among LGBTQ+ athletes.
Diversity training and professional conduct rules can improve LGBTQ experiences with government and the law.
Courts face religious freedom challenges from instructors over transgender students’ preferred names.
Federal and state reforms are needed to protect elderly LGBTQ+ individuals.
Even after Bostock, the state legislature needs to pass the Pennsylvania Fairness Act.
Without concrete data-reporting requirements, child welfare laws cannot adequately protect LGBTQ+ foster youth.
Far from being narrow, the U.S. Supreme Court’s latest LGBTQ+ decision may threaten government’s overall regulatory authority.
In a ruling last week, the U.S. Supreme Court moved closer to allowing LGBTQ+ discrimination.
In honor of Pride Month, The Regulatory Review brings together leading scholars to discuss LGBTQ+ regulatory issues.
Scholars document the abuse of noncitizens in airports and airplanes across previous administrations.
Differing judicial positions on the ADA’s application to websites set up a potential Supreme Court case.