Experts debate EPA’s recent move to consider regulating its own cost-benefit analyses.
Expert argues that suits under California’s environmental law undercut housing and climate change goals.
Former EPA Administrator’s last action may foreshadow the agency’s future plans for regulating pollution.
Recent state supreme court decision reaffirms and expands a constitutional duty to preserve natural resources.
Rankings for company’s new headquarters offer cautionary lessons about using rankings as regulatory tools.
The deregulatory agenda should be replaced with a regulatory improvement agenda.
A federal appellate court decision could send foie gras off the menu—again.
Revising FERC’s open access tariff rules would reverse 40 years of progress.
The Trump Administration’s purported economic justification weakens the credibility of cost-benefit analysis.
D.C. Circuit holds federal energy regulators must consider pipeline project’s impact on climate change.
Final rule creates tension between conservationists and wildlife officials.
State and local regulators will face challenges in trying to pick up the slack after a federal withdrawal from the Paris Agreement.