Synopsis

Scholars suggest that the revised Circular A-94 will help agencies focus on welfare over efficiency in benefit-cost analysis.

Scholar suggests reforms to make debt discharge more equitable under U.S. bankruptcy law.

Scholar warns that corporate social activism might erode democratic institutions, despite possible benefits.

Scholars argue that relaxing zoning laws may not have the effect that policymakers intend.

Scholars present a framework for digital asset regulation to prevent fraudulent and deceptive practices.

Scholars argue that the best way to improve labor law is to change union election rules.

Scholar proposes a new U.S. regulatory system that would be more accountable to the public.

Scholar corrects the narrative that spawned laws prohibiting banks from cutting ties with the gun industry.

Scholar suggests that public school students have a right to receive critical race theory education.

Scholar sees design flaws in federal water pollution law as fueling rival legal theories.

Scholars claim that the cost of regulatory compliance disproportionately affects medium-sized firms.

Scholars offer a new analytic approach to testing platforms for self-preferencing bias.