The United States needs a bipartisan push to bring transparency and accountability back into the rulemaking process.
Legal scholar argues for greater reliance on entrepreneurial strategies in regulation.
Administrative agencies should not be required to use a process that has been obsolete for decades.
Scholar examines the role of contempt findings in ensuring agency compliance with court orders.
The Early Participation in Regulations Act will further complicate the rulemaking process.
Legal scholar reexamines the formal rulemaking process in response to criticism.
Influenced by American and Western practices, China continues to produce governmental innovations.
Scholars debate the merits and drawbacks of the recently proposed Regulatory Accountability Act, which would dramatically reform the rulemaking process.
Regulatory reform bill’s public hearing requirement will hinder agencies’ attempts to regulate.
Recent bill would provide much-needed change to the most prominent source of U.S. administrative law.
President Trump’s “one-in, two-out” mandate is irrational and violates the Constitution.
Provisions of the Senate’s Regulatory Accountability Act would do more harm than good.