The Trump Administration’s deregulatory response to COVID-19 is temporary and will not have a lasting impact on U.S. health care.
Administrative law principles led the Supreme Court to deliver a victorious but unsatisfying and uncertain conclusion for migrants.
An uncertain future awaits the federal program designed to benefit children of immigrants.
A recent Supreme Court decision maintains protection for people who arrived to the United States as children.
The Trump Administration’s regulatory rollbacks will not have staying power among future administrations.
President Trump’s deregulatory agenda may have lasting effects beyond the term of his presidency.
Conservative justices embrace delegation to arbitration panels while questioning administrative process.
A proposed rule to speed up administrative decision-making could have unintended consequences.
The FTC should use adjudications to establish policy on employment non-compete clauses.
Congress and the White House should bring scholars together to craft a bipartisan solution to civil service challenges.
Scholars argue that federal agencies should not use guidance documents to regulate controversial issues.
The unprecedented deference conferred by Department of Commerce v. New York sets the tone for cases to come.