Administrative Procedure Act

Scholar argues that courts should scrutinize delegations to the President more closely than those to agencies.

Weakening agency independence could make agency adjudication unconstitutional without judicial review.

Scholar warns that the fall of Chevron deference could destabilize health care fraud enforcement.

Calling an unlawful transfer of statutory functions a “partnership” does not make it legal.

After Learning Resources, the major questions doctrine appears more tenuous.

Federal Agencies’ growing use of AI raises questions about how judges can adequately review those agencies’ decisions.

ACUS recommends best practices for agencies implementing temporary rules.

ACUS recommends best practices for improving private citizens’ access to government records.

Circumventing notice and comment during rulemaking can weaken the evidentiary basis for regulation.

Although artificial intelligence can support many tasks, officials should beware of overly confident results.

The Administrative Procedure Act empowers courts—not agencies—to decide a statute’s single best meaning.

New limits on ATF’s ability to expand statutory scope by redefining key terms may have broader implications.