Mass Comments in Administrative Rulemaking
Experts consider the value of mass comment campaigns during notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Virtual Hearings in Agency Adjudication
ACUS assesses the changing landscape of how agencies use new technologies to hold hearings.
Increasing Early, Transparent Consideration of Regulatory Alternatives
Agencies can do more to disclose input on regulatory alternatives during notice-and-comment processes.
Improving the Management of Public Comments in a Digital Age
ACUS recommends best practices for how agencies manage mass, computer-generated, and falsely attributed public comments.
Improving Participation, Impact, and Fairness in the Administrative State
ACUS issues new recommendations to enhance administrative governance.
Improving Agency Litigation Webpages
A new ACUS recommendation emphasizes how agencies can increase public access to litigation information.
Improving Models for Agency Appellate Review
An ACUS study examines how agency review models differ across agencies.
Rules for the Rule-Makers
ACUS releases a recommendation for how agencies should regulate their rulemaking procedures.
Rethinking Discretionary Bid Protests
Bid challenges are effective management tools, not just administrative attacks.
Using Artificial Intelligence in Administrative Agencies
ACUS issues a statement to help agencies make more informed decisions about artificial intelligence.
Publication of Policies Governing Agency Adjudicators
To enhance transparency, agencies should publish information about adjudicators on their websites.
Transparency and Privacy in Public Rulemaking Dockets
A new ACUS recommendation seeks to balance transparency with privacy when agencies disclose rulemaking comments.