Regulatory Writing Competition Winners
The Regulatory Review features the winners of Penn Law administrative essay writing competition.
The Supreme Court’s Regulatory Term
The Regulatory Review highlights the regulatory decisions from the Supreme Court’s past term.
Is Mandatory Disclosure Helping Consumers?
The Regulatory Review features commentators on a recent book that questions whether mandatory disclosure is really working.
The Debate Over “Sue-and-Settle” Legislation
The Regulatory Review post sparks further debate over recent bill to curb negotiated agreements about rulemaking.
High Court Hears Debate Over Costs and Benefits of Regulating Air Pollution
The Regulatory Review features commentaries on this term’s oral arguments in Michigan v. EPA.
The Struggle Over the Constitution in the Workplace
The Regulatory Review features commentators on a new book that analyzes the campaign to give constitutional rights to workers.
Incorporating Private Standards into Public Regulations
Commentators assess final rule on how agencies incorporate private standards into public regulations.
The Debate Over the Common Core State Standards
The Regulatory Review features seven new essays over two-weeks on the Common Core.
Regulatory Year in Review: 2014
The Regulatory Review celebrates the developments in regulatory news, analysis, and opinion of 2014.
Regulatory Essay Competition Winners
The Regulatory Review celebrates winners of innovative essay contest conducted by Penn Law Professor Sophia Lee in her administrative law class.
Debating the Independent Retrospective Review of Regulations
The Regulatory Review features the debate over an independent process for reviewing existing rules.
Does Regulation Kill Jobs?
New book from Penn Program on Regulation explores the connection between regulation and employment.