Series

Regulatory Writing Competition Winners

The Regulatory Review features the winners of Penn Law administrative essay writing competition.

The Supreme Court’s Regulatory Term

The Regulatory Review highlights the regulatory decisions from the Supreme Court’s past term.

Is Mandatory Disclosure Helping Consumers?

The Regulatory Review features commentators on a recent book that questions whether mandatory disclosure is really working.

The Debate Over “Sue-and-Settle” Legislation

The Regulatory Review post sparks further debate over recent bill to curb negotiated agreements about rulemaking.

High Court Hears Debate Over Costs and Benefits of Regulating Air Pollution

The Regulatory Review features commentaries on this term’s oral arguments in Michigan v. EPA.

The Struggle Over the Constitution in the Workplace

The Regulatory Review features commentators on a new book that analyzes the campaign to give constitutional rights to workers.

Incorporating Private Standards into Public Regulations

Commentators assess final rule on how agencies incorporate private standards into public regulations.

The Debate Over the Common Core State Standards

The Regulatory Review features seven new essays over two-weeks on the Common Core.

Regulatory Year in Review: 2014

The Regulatory Review celebrates the developments in regulatory news, analysis, and opinion of 2014.

Is it Time to Reconsider Chevron Deference?

The Regulatory Review proudly features the remarks of Ann R. Klee, keynote speaker at the Penn Program on Regulation’s annual dinner.

Regulatory Essay Competition Winners

The Regulatory Review celebrates winners of innovative essay contest conducted by Penn Law Professor Sophia Lee in her administrative law class.

Debating the Independent Retrospective Review of Regulations

The Regulatory Review features the debate over an independent process for reviewing existing rules.