Valuing and Devaluing Regulatory Benefits
The Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to decline to monetize effects from air pollution prompts reactions by regulatory experts.
The Uncertain Future of Hard Look Review
Scholars debate whether the duty to engage in reasoned decision-making should be reconsidered.
The 2025 Regulatory Year in Review
The Regulatory Review presents its top essays, series, and features from the past year.
Speeding Up the Deregulatory Process
Experts question the legality and wisdom of the Trump Administration’s plan to speed up agencies’ deregulatory efforts.
Strengthening Agency Processes Through Transparency and Engagement
ACUS recommends best practices for investigations, consultation, and public participation in regulatory programs.
Revisiting Broadcast Fairness
Scholars and practitioners debate the continued need for the FCC’s fairness doctrine for broadcast news.
The Supreme Court’s 2024-2025 Regulatory Term
Scholars and practitioners examine the Court’s most important regulatory decisions of this past term.
Toward a More Accessible and Accountable Administrative State
ACUS recommends best practices for nonlawyer representation, AI tools, and public participation in rulemaking.
President Trump’s First 100 Days of Deregulation
Scholars examine the pace and potential impact of President Trump’s first 100 days.
Presidential Legacies of Regulatory Reform
Experts reflect on a new book assessing Presidents’ impact on regulatory priorities and successes.
Looking Back on How Government Built America
As the second Trump Administration begins, scholars reflect on the new book, How Government Built America.
The 2024 Regulatory Year in Review
The Regulatory Review presents its top essays, series, and features from the past year.