Week in Review

Font Size:

Andrew Puzder withdraws his nomination to serve as Labor Secretary, President Trump uses the CRA to repeal regulations, and more…

Font Size:


  • President Trump signed a second Congressional Review Act resolution into law—this one repealing the U.S. Department of the Interior’s stream protection rule—which was issued in December 2016, making it one of the last major regulations issued by the Obama Administration, and which was intended to protect streams from the impact of coal mining by requiring that mining permits not be issued unless “the proposed operation would not result in material damage to the hydrologic balance outside the permit area.”
  • The insurance company Humana reportedly announced that in 2018 it will stop selling health insurance plans on the state exchanges established under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The decision will make Humana the “first major insurer to fully exit Obamacare,” although other insurers have reportedly expressed concern about the ACA’s uncertain future and a possible replacement. President Trump cited the decision by Humana as evidence of the ACA’s failure and reiterated his promise to repeal and replace the law.
  • The U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate continued to pass Congressional Review Act resolutions to revoke regulations issued at the end of the Obama Administration. The House voted to repeal a rule issued by the U.S. Department of Labor (Labor Department) that would have restricted when states could require applicants for unemployment benefits to pass a drug test, and voted to repeal two other Labor Department rules setting guidelines for states and municipalities creating retirement savings programs for low-income workers. The Senate passed a resolution, which had already passed the House, repealing a Social Security Administration rule that would have restricted Social Security recipients with certain mental disabilities from owning guns.
  • The Trump administration signaled a reverse from Obama Administration policy by submitting a motion to withdraw a motion to stay the temporary injunction issued by Judge Reed O’Connor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas in response to a challenge brought by 12 states against the U.S. Department of Education’s guidance instructing public schools to allow transgender students to use the bathroom corresponding to their gender identity. Specifically, the U.S. Department of Justice is withdrawing a motion that asks the court to apply the injunction only to the states involved in the lawsuit.


  • In an article for Bloomberg View, Professor Cass Sunstein of Harvard Law School praised an interim guidance document issued by the Trump Administration to clarify President Trump’s executive order requiring that two regulations be repealed for every one regulation issued because the guidance “sensibly” and concisely answered many of the questions raised by the executive order. Nonetheless, Sunstein noted, “the whole idea of ‘one in, two out’ has a gimmicky quality” and “[t]he simpler approach would be to ensure that any new regulations really are justified, while also carefully scrutinizing old regulations and eliminating those that are unjustified.”
  • The Heritage Foundation recently released its 2017 Index of Economic Freedom, which evaluates the degree of “economic freedom”—defined as “the fundamental right of every human to control his or her own labor and property”—in countries around the world based on a number of factors. The United States received its lowest numerical score ever and ranked as the 17th most free economy in the world. Countries ranked above the United States include Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
  • Writing for Vox, Jeff Clements, the president of American Promise, and John Coates, a professor at Harvard Law School, argue that corporations are misusing the First Amendment in an attempt to circumvent regulations. Drawing comparisons to the tobacco industry, the authors discuss a recent suit brought by Exxon Mobil against the attorneys general of Massachusetts and New York, in which Exxon claimed “a previously unrecognized corporate right under the Constitution both to ‘speak’ and to ‘not speak’ about climate change any way it wants.”