Opinion

Information technology has disrupted regulatory regimes and recast policy debates.

Research suggests removing barriers to entry would effectively lower global income inequality.

More collaboration between government, employers, and labor would help combat income inequality.

Data show that geography and party affiliation predict state agencies’ pushback against federal policies.

Improving regulatory performance is vital for making Americans better off.

Policy oscillation creates serious problems that may require government scrutiny.

Supreme Court approval of patent adjudication raises new questions about limits of modern agency adjudication.

Interested stakeholders may have a role in quantifying deregulatory impacts for agencies.

Retrospective regulatory review should concentrate not only on reducing costs but also on creating benefits, like improving societal well-being.

The Supreme Court should follow the Fourth Circuit in prohibiting impermissible animus while maintaining the President’s discretion.

Regulators need a new system for responding to evolving market forces.

Deregulatory executive orders require a new approach to analyzing regulatory impact.